Evolutionary Leadership: The Embodiment of Systems Being

In a previous post, I presented the need to move from systems thinking to systems being.

There is a reason for that: I believe that it is through systems being that we will be able to truly transform our world. And transforming the world is the task of leaders. However, the most prevalent understanding of leadership is narrow and hierarchical: one leader on top and many followers below; few with power and many powerless.

As members of society and organizations, we have accepted a passive, victim stance in the face of complex challenges while we point fingers hoping that elected officials and business executives take care of our problems. Our behavior represents a relinquishing of our power. We suffer the problems but we don’t see ourselves as part of the solutions. And if we find ourselves dissatisfied about our leaders, we act as if we can’t do anything about it.

This distorted concept of leadership needs to be revised and expanded, because it is not very useful and it may be dangerous in today’s world. By our mere participation in social structures through our daily lives, we are creating our future. But we haven’t done so consciously.

Peter Senge shares the view that "ultimately, leadership is about creating new realities." He once said, "Because of our obsession with how leaders behave and with the interactions of leaders and followers, we forget that in its essence, leadership is about learning how to shape the future.... Leadership exists when people are no longer victims of circumstances but participate in creating new circumstances. Leadership is about creating a domain in which human beings continually deepen their understanding of reality and become more capable of participating in the unfolding of the world.”

In our blindness to our own power as participants and co-creators—as leaders—in “community,” we too often give up our right and responsibility to co-author the narrative of our lives. Author Parker J. Palmer expressed this notion beautifully.

"'Leadership,'" Palmer once wrote, "is a concept we often resist. It seems immodest, even self-aggrandizing, to think of ourselves as leaders. But if it is true that we are made for community, then leadership is everyone’s vocation, and it can be an evasion to insist that it is not. When we live in the close-knit ecosystem called community, everyone follows and everyone leads.”

This idea that “everyone follows and everyone leads” is powerful because it captures the understanding that we are co-producers of our social realities. It is a reflection of the systemic nature of human relations: fluid, dynamic, reciprocal.

Leadership is not static. Evolutionary leadership is an ever-changing flux of interconnections that seek to intentionally create the conditions for the emergence of a better future, or “for the good of the whole” as Peter Merry wrote in the dedication of his book Evolutionary Leadership: Integral Leadership for an Increasingly Complex World.

Evolutionary leadership is shared leadership that embraces the complexity and interconnectedness of the world’s problems—the "problematique"—and acknowledges the need to collaborate and create a synergic system of innovative solutions—the "solutionatique." Evolutionary leadership is a means for each one of us to understand that we have a role to play in the creation of a better world no matter what our field, interests, or expertise—whether we are improving educational systems, saving the rainforest, transforming organizational cultures, engaging youth in creative expression, producing renewable energy or serving victims of abuse.

In my view, evolutionary leadership is an expanded (and expanding) notion of leadership. It goes beyond a leadership concern with narrowly defined success—as in the corporate world—to a more systemic and inclusive notion of success that takes into account the economy, society, ecosystems, and future generations.

I see two dimensions of evolutionary leadership.

The first dimension of evolutionary leadership calls for ongoing learning and personal development because it demands more capacities and skills to cope with increasing complexity.

The second dimension involves an expansion of the boundaries of the inquiry, seeking to contribute to the transformation of social and environmental systems in an increasingly inclusive way. The inquiry may begin in a local community or organization, but it eventually becomes connected with socio-ecological efforts.

 

-- Kathia Laszlo, Ph.D., is a faculty member of Saybrook University's organizational systems program

 

Photo courtesy of DreamsTime.com.

 

Keep up with our community! 

Follow Us on Facebook | Follow Us on Twitter | Visit Saybrook's Organizational Systems program

 

Comments

[Julie Auger]

Kathia,

Your post is very refreshing for me. I've wrestled with the narrow idea of leadership and often say that we are ALL leaders, ALL of the time. Yet, the way you have articulated leadership here is much clearer and better defined than I have been able to express in the past.

Thank you!

[Kathia]

Thank you Julie! I have started to articulate my thoughts about leadership and I appreciate your feedback. I'll be happy to share a fuller article (in process) to be publish in the journal Organisational Transformation and Social Change about this topic. Warmly, Kathia

[manuel manga]

Kathia,
I liked your ontological understanding that we are all creators our worlds whether conscious or unconsciously. In that ontological sense we are all leaders, as you point out, your invitation for all of us citizens to recover our sense of leadership and bring forth a coherent and systemic sustainable future is right on. I look forward to your article. I would add that everyone can be an evolutionary leader, it is something that one can BE and learn. You are all invited. love, Manuel

[Lori]

Hello Kathia, I enjoyed this post very much. Systems being, from my perspective, is more whole and real than systems thinking, and I thought the very same thing back in 2007 when I attended my first systems thinking conference! For me today, dropping the "system" in favor of just "being" is even more whole and real to my experience. Learning to find happiness in just being, releasing professional titles to the wind in favor of learning as groups of happy amateurs, and learning profound life lessons from everyone who shows up in our lives... but I digress. :-) FYI, I learn as self-organizing groups and communities and write happily about our experiences here: www.collectiveself.com. What these groups teach may be of interest to you.

[Kathia]

Thank you Manuel for your comment. Not only everyone can be an evolutionary leader, IMHO everybody *should* be one -- accepting our responsibility in the creation of a sustainable future is something we can't pass.

[Kathia]

Lori, thank you for pointing me out to your work. Yes, of course, we are talking about *being* in the deepest and fullest sense. But most of the insights about the importance of being comes from spiritual traditions. Systems being is a pathway from the science side -- hopefully we'll converge and get to a place where there is no need to "talk" systems anymore. That would be a true marker of an evolved consciousness and culture. Best, K