Leading thinkers in sustainability have known for some time now that a sustainable society can’t be based on continuous consumption. The question was always: how do we get there?
A recent column in the New York Times suggests that it’s happening on its own, without any help from us.
In “We’re Spent,” journalist David Leonhardt suggests that the drying up of credit and access to easy debt is functioning the same way as environmentalists have suggested that running out of natural resources eventually will. It’s causing a system that is powered by a disposable consumer mentality to run down.
“(T)he economic version of the law of gravity is reasserting itself,” he writes. “We are feeling the deferred pain from 25 years of excess, as people try to rebuild their depleted savings … The old consumer economy is gone, and it’s not coming back.”
Could it be that easy? Are economic realities going to do what decades of environmental awareness-raising and activism couldn’t?
These aren’t incidental questions. Until they’re answered – until people are offered a positive vision of what a sustainable economy looks like and what’s in it for them – many well-meaning people at all levels of society will drag their feet, or even put up a fight. Until a meaningful outline of “how this will work” and “what my place in it will be” gets offered up, a great deal of human energy will be spent putting our back against the wall instead of building a new society.
But if Leonhardt’s essay isn’t sufficient, it does raise a compelling point for advocates of sustainability. Maybe we’re asking the wrong questions. Maybe instead of spending so much energy trying to figure out how we get there, we need to start mapping just what “there” is.
-- Benjamin Wachs
Keep up with our community!
- Follow Rethinking Complexity on Facebook
- Follow Saybrook University on Twitter
- Learn more about Saybrook's organizational systems program
Comments